Stablecoins Won’t Replace Cards — They’ll Replace What Cards Can’t Fix
Stablecoins Won’t Replace Cards — They’ll Replace What Cards Can’t Fix
Stablecoins aren’t here to replace cards.
And they don’t need to.
Cards are exceptional at one thing: distribution. They’re familiar, widely accepted, and hard-wired into how we move through the world. Tap, pay, move on. The checkout experience isn’t broken.
But everything behind the checkout is.
Where Stablecoins Are Actually Competing
What stablecoins are quietly rewriting is the back-office architecture consumers never see:
- Settlement: Moving from T+2 to right now
- Treasury: Managing liquidity without weekend blackouts
- Reconciliation: Ending the expensive, manual hunt for cross-border errors
That’s where the real tension is building.
Banks protect deposits. That’s their business model.
Payment networks protect interchange. That’s theirs.
When dollars move as tokens, they settle continuously. No batch windows. No weekends. No correspondent banking chains stitched together across time zones.
This isn’t a marginally better card experience.
It’s a fundamentally different settlement model.
“Stablecoins don’t compete at the terminal. They compete in the ledger.”
Why Everyone Feels Supportive — And Hesitant
This explains the strange friction we’re seeing now.
Banks say they’re supportive, but keep stablecoins at arm’s length from core deposits. Networks talk about innovation, while ensuring cards remain the default interface.
Everyone is happy to call stablecoins “interesting” — as long as they stay at the edges.
Meanwhile, stablecoin rails are quietly absorbing the flows legacy systems handle poorly:
- Cross-border B2B payments
- Institutional treasury operations
- Internal entity and intercompany transfers
Places where speed and 24/7 availability matter more than a plastic logo in a wallet.
As I wrote earlier about stablecoins and settlement infrastructure, adoption doesn’t start where incumbents are strongest. It starts where the old pipes fail under real-world constraints.
The Card Debate Misses the Point
The debate about whether stablecoins will replace Visa or Mastercard misses the point.
Stablecoins don’t win by killing cards at the merchant terminal.
They win by reducing how often money needs to touch slow, expensive plumbing in the first place.
The real question isn’t “will stablecoins kill cards?”
It’s whether banks and networks can adapt to a world where settlement no longer needs them by default.
That’s the fight worth watching.
Teams Building for This Shift
Some of the teams building directly into this change:
- OpenFX
- SOOHO.IO
- Conduit
- Bridge
- Paxos
- zerohash
- Mesh
- IMMERSVE
- Kulipa
- Fiat Republic
- Holyheld
- Sphere Labs
- Mural Pay
- Félix
- Parallax (acquired by Phantom)
- KAST
- Gnosis Pay
- Reap
- Rain
- BVNK
- Tempo
- Oobit
- Toku
Incumbents & Infrastructure to Watch
- Visa
- Mastercard
- Circle
- Tether
- Thunes
- MoonPay
- Ripple
- Stripe
- PayPal
- Checkout.com
- Fireblocks
- Cobo
- Coinbase (payments stack)